search for



Cross mark




View (67) Download (2413) CrossRef (1)
Evaluation and Development of Tobacco Control Policies Using Delphi Technique
Journal of the Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2011; 2(1): 30-41
Published online January 15, 2011
© 2011 The Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Jeong-Min Kim, Young-Su Ju1*, Yeol Kim2, Hong-Gwan Seo2

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Cheongju Medical Center, Cheongju; 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang; 2Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
Background: In spite of the ratification of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2005, the smoking rate of adult males has been at a standstill, and the average starting age of smoking has declined gradually in Korea.

Methods: We conducted a Delphi study to assess the effect of existing tobacco control policies, the necessity and feasibility of suggested anti-tobacco policies, and the relevance of indicators for evaluating the effect of no smoking policies. To prioritize tobacco control policies, we calculated the importance scores of existing tobacco control policies and the necessity and feasibility index of suggested anti-tobacco policies.

Results: The most effective existing policies for reducing tobacco use in adults were price and tax measures, restrictions on smoking in public places, and anti-smoking advertising. The suggested anti-tobacco policies with high necessity and high feasibility were to ensure that all indoor places are free from exposure to second-hand smoke, intensify effective packaging and labelling measures, prohibit use of terms such as 'low tar', 'light', 'mild', implement comprehensive ban on direct and indirect tobacco advertising, abolish a tax-exemption system for sales of tobacco products, develop programs on tobacco control addressed to decision-makers, healthcare professionals and other concerned persons, and enforce various monitoring researches of tobacco use.

Conclusion: The existing tobacco control policies assessed to be effective are needed to enforce progressively. The suggested anti-tobacco policies are required to set their priorities and introduce selectively by the necessity and feasibility of theirs.
Keywords : Delphi technique; Tobacco; Policy
  1. World Health O, Research for International Tobacco C. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008 : the MPOWER package. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  2. Jee SH, Lee JK, Kim IS. Smoking-Attributable Mortality Among Korean Adults: 1981-2003. Korean J Epidemiol 2006; 28: 92-9.
  3. Park SE, Song HR, Kim CH, Ko SK. Economic Burden of Smoking in Korea, 2007. Korean J Health Promot Dis Prev 2008; 8: 219-27.
  4. Choi EJ. Review of selected impacts of the Korean Tobacco Control Policy and implications for future systematic implementation. JKSRNT 2010; 1: 12-25.
  5. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. , Advanced Book Program; 1975. p. 3-5.
  6. Rho SY. Delphi Technique: future forecasting with professional insights. Planning and Policy. 2006: 53-62.
  7. Who. WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
  8. Hwang SW, Gwon SH, Lee MK. A Study on the Delphi Survey on R&D Projects for Urban Regeneration in Korea. Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference; 2009 Sep; Daejeon, Korea. Seoul: Korea Technology Innovation Society; 2009.
  9. Khang YH, Yoon SJ, Kang GW, Kim CY, Yoo KY, Shin YS. An application of Delphi method to the assessment of current status of cancer research. Korean J Prev Med 1998; 31: 844-56.
  10. Khorramshahgol R, Moustakis VS. Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 1988; 37: 347-54.
  11. Gracht H. The Future of Logistics: Scenarios for 2025: Gabler; 2008. p. 51-63.
  12. Banks DE, Shi R, McLarty J, Cowl CT, Smith D, Tarlo SM et al. American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos. Results of a Delphi study. Chest 2009; 135: 1619-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Park S, Kim YM, Cho SI. Comprehension and application of SimSmoke Model to predict the future smoking prevalence and evaluate the tobacco control policies. JKSRNT 2010; 1: 73-84.
  14. Hopkins DP, Husten CG, Fielding JE, Rosenquist JN, Westphal LL. Evidence reviews and recommendations on interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: a summary of selected guidelines. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20(2 Suppl): 67-87.
  15. Seo HG, Cheong YS, Myung SK, Kim Y, Lee WB, Fong GT. Smoking-related characteristics in Korean adult smokers: findings from the 2005 International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey-Korea. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2008; 29: 844-53.
  16. Lee EH, Park SK, Ko KP, Cho IS, Chang SH, Shin HR et al. Cigarette smoking and mortality in the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) Study. J Prev Med Public Health 2010; 43: 151-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Chang SO, Kim EJ, Kil SY, Seomun GA, Lee SJ. Influential variables on intention and action to quit smoking between adolescent smokers and adult smokers-based on the transtheoretical model. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2005; 35: 1410-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Kim YS, Jeong BR. An analysis of articles related to smoking and smoking cessation of Korean adolescents. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs 2010; 21: 53-62.
  19. Song TM. Smoking cessation clinics at public health centers in Korea. Health Welfare Policy Forum 2007; 129: 50-65.
  20. Song TM. The development of model for telephone quitline. Health Welfare Policy Forum 2005; 105: 70-82.
  21. Gruer L, Hart CL, Gordon DS, Watt GC. Effect of tobacco smoking on survival of men and women by social position: a 28 year cohort study. BMJ 2009; 338: b480.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Ross H, Chaloupka FJ. Economic policies for tobacco control in developing countries. Salud Publica Mex 2006; 48(Suppl 1): S113-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef