search for



KCI

Crossref

Cross mark

Cited-by

Fundref

TDM

CrossRef (0)
Stealth Use of Electronic Cigarettes in Smoke-Free Areas in South Korea
J Korean Soc Res Nicotine Tob 2020; 11(2): 75-83
Published online December 15, 2020
© 2020 The Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Hyun Jung Lee, Hong Jun Cho*

Department of Family Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: 議고솉以
슱궛븰援 쓽怨쇰븰 꽌슱븘궛蹂묒썝 媛젙쓽븰怨
E-mail: hjcho@amc.seoul.kr
ORDID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-6549
Received September 8, 2020; Revised October 19, 2020; Accepted October 20, 2020.
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, dis-tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 Abstract
Background: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) were introduced in South Korea in 2008. ECs are devices that vaporize a solution that the user then inhales unlike combustible cigarettes (CCs) where tobacco leaves are burnt. Therefore, stealth use of ECs could be easier than stealth use of CCs since they produce less odor and smoke. This study aims to examine the use of ECs and factors associated with this trend.
Methods: The online panel survey was conducted on 7,000 adults (males 2,300; females 4,700; age, 20-69 years) from November 3, 2018 to November 9, 2018. Females were oversampled given the very low prevalence of tobacco use among women in Korea. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted on stealth use of ECs, adjusted for sociodemographic variables and notion for using ECs in indoor public places.
Results: In Korea, 83.5% of smokers experienced stealth use of ECs in areas where smoking was prohibited. The online survey shows that users of triple tobacco products including CCs, ECs, and heated tobacco products are more likely to have experienced stealth use than EC single users (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.48-5.48). In addition, people who answered 쏽es to the question of whether ECs are allowed in the non-smoking area are more likely to have experienced the stealth use of ECs than those who answered 쏯o or 쏧 don셳 know (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.69-5.22).
Conclusion: Stealth use is common among EC users, especially triple users and those who are not aware of the EC use are also prohibited in indoor public places.
Keywords : E-cigarette; Stealth use; Smoke-free area; Triple users; Perception
References
  1. Lim J, Lee JA, Fong GT, Yan M, Driezen P, Seo HG et al. Awareness and use of e-cigarettes and vaping behaviors among Korean adult smokers:ITC 2016 Korean study. Journal of the Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2018; 9: 11-21.
    CrossRef
  2. Cooke A, Fergeson J, Bulkhi A, Casale TB. The Electronic Cigarette: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3(4):498-505.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Brown J, West R, Beard E, Michie S, Shahab L, McNeill A. Prevalence and characteristics of e-cigarette users in Great Britain: Findings from a general population survey of smokers. Addict Behav. 2014; 39(6):1120-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. King BA, Patel R, Nguyen KH, Dube SR. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(2): 219-27.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Cullen KA, Gentzke AS, Sawdey MD, Chang JT, Anic GM, Wang TW, et al. E-cigarette use among youth in the United States, 2019. Jama. ;322(21): 2095-103.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Ministry of Health and Welfare KCfDCaP. 2015 National Health Statistics II; The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2018.
  7. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smoke-free Policies, Chapter 3: The Evolution of Smoke-Free Policies. Lyon, France: IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. 2009.
  8. Public Health Service OotSG. The Health Consequences of Smoking. National Clearinghouse for Smoking and Health. Washington DC: The Health Consequence of Smoking. 1972.
  9. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. 2006.
  10. Hyland A, Barnoya J, Corral JE. Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tob Control. 2012; 21(2): 154-61.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lee S, Kong J. JUUL. Journal of the Korean Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2019; 10(1): 1-8.
    CrossRef
  12. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. World Health Organization. 2003.
  13. Korean Association on Smoking or Health K. A war that changes the world - Movement of smoking cessation and understanding the regulatory policy of smoking. Seoul: Momentobook; 2018. P.143-144.
  14. Food and Drug Administration HHS. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; restrictions on the sale and distribution of tobacco products and required warning statements for tobacco products. Final rule. Federal register; 2016.
  15. Yong HH, Borland R, Balmford J, McNeill A, Hitchman S, Driezen P, et al. Trends in E-Cigarette Awareness, Trial, and Use Under the Different Regulatory Environments of Australia and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(10): 1203-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes: National Academies Press; 2018.
  17. Grana R, Benowitz N, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes: a scientific review. Circulation. 2014; 129(19): 1972-86.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Prochaska JJJA. The public health consequences of e릀igarettes: a review by the National Academies of Sciences. A call for more research, a need for regulatory action. 2019; 114(4): 587-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Goniewicz ML, Smith DM, Edwards KC, Blount BC, Caldwell KL, Feng J, et al. Comparison of nicotine and toxicant exposure in users of electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. 2018; 1(8): e185937.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Flouris AD, Chorti MS, Poulianiti KP, Jamurtas AZ, Kostikas K, Tzatzarakis MN, et al. Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung function. Inhal Toxicol. 2013; 25(2): 91-101.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Westenberger BJ. Evaluation of e-Cigarettes. St Louis, MO:Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2009: 1-8.
  22. Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2014; 23(2): 133-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Williams M, Villarreal A, Bozhilov K, Lin S, Talbot P. Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e57987.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Biener L, Hargraves JL. A longitudinal study of electronic cigarette use among a population-based sample of adult smokers: association with smoking cessation and motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 17(2):127-33.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Yingst JM, Lester C, Veldheer S, Allen SI, Du P, Foulds J. E-cigarette users commonly stealth vape in places where e-cigarette use is prohibited. Tob Control. 2019; 28(5): 493-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Sung HY, Wang Y, Yao T, Lightwood J, Max WJN, Research T. Polytobacco use and nicotine dependence symptoms among US adults, 2012-2014. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018; 20(suppl_1): S88-S98.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef